Pfizer for the whole pfamily

Good news for people with kids: this week, Pfizer and BioNTech released results for their trial involving adolescents aged 12-15. In the trial, no participants who received the vaccine contracted symptomatic COVID-19 out of a total of 2,260 participants, marking an efficacy rate of 100%. (Remember in December the efficacy rate was 95% for adults.) 18 participants in the placebo group did get symptomatic COVID-19. Additionally, Dr. Fauci said in the April 2 White House COVID-19 briefing that, by the end of the year, there should be enough data to safely vaccinate children of any age. 

The results are, obviously, fantastic. But there was a wrinkle in reporting said results; one that pointed to the dangers of communicating science via press release. Originally, as Dr. Natalie Dean pointed out on Twitter, there was some confusion over whether there were no cases in the vaccinated group at all, or whether there were just no symptomatic cases:

This is pretty important as infections in this group tend to be asymptomatic. Apoorva Mandavilli, who broke the Pfizer story for the New York Times, clarified that she had been told that there were in fact no infections:

Until someone pointed out that STAT had clarified that there were no symptomatic infections: 

Mandavilli decided to triple check, and turns out:

Basically, someone at Pfizer messed up and incorrectly said that there had been no infections in the vaccine group at all when they really meant that there were no symptomatic infections. It doesn’t look like they regularly tested participants who had gotten the vaccine vs participants who got the placebo. This sounds like splitting hairs, but precision matters when communicating the results of highly anticipated trials. “No infections” and “no symptomatic cases” are different results. It’s a blow to Pfizer’s credibility in their press releases, and it was probably at least really annoying for Mandavilli. 

In the meantime, Johnson & Johnson has also begun a trial in adolescents, so hopefully whoever is running PR for them saw this Twitter thread (or is reading this article 👀) and will know to be more careful than the Pfizer guy was. 

But for now, we can rejoice in what is still very promising data. You get a Pfizer! And you get a Pfizer! How about a Pfizer for the little one? EVERYBODY GETS A PFIZER! (Well, when it gets actually authorized for that age group.)

Related posts

  • The booster shot conversation: What you should know
    Recently, a lot of U.S. COVID-19 news has centered around booster shots—additional vaccine doses to boost patients’ immunity against the coronavirus. Questions abound: do we need these shots, when might we need them, how do they impact vaccination campaigns?
  • What’s up with Texas’ county-level vaccination data?
    Anyone who’s tried to work with the federal government’s vaccination data has noticed this issue: there’s a Texas-shaped hole in the numbers. While the CDC and HHS report vaccination data for counties and metropolitan areas in the vast majority of states, data are missing for the entire state of Texas.
  • Breakthrough cases: What we know right now
    While epidemiologists may consider any new outbreak a possible source of new variants, one key way to monitor the virus/variant race is by analyzing breakthrough cases—those infections that occur after someone has been fully vaccinated. Here’s how states and the CDC are tracking these cases now, and what we know about vaccine protection against the variants.
  • The US missed Biden’s July 4 goal: How did your community do?
    The U.S. missed President Biden’s big vaccination goal: 70% of adults vaccinated with at least one dose by July 4. As of July 3, we are at 67% of adults with one dose, and 58% fully vaccinated. But rates vary widely by state and county: There are over 1,000 counties in the U.S. with one-dose vaccination rates under 30%, CDC Director Dr. Walensky said at a press briefing last week.

One thought on “Pfizer for the whole pfamily

Leave a Reply